Dear Doc:
A friend of mine (if ya know what I mean) uses peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing software. She downloads cool things from the Internet, but then sorta-kinda-almost instantly erases them from her computer. Is this okay?
Signed,
MovieFan
Dear Fan:
Ahem…If I were your friend, I would stop doing that stuff. NOW! You see, those “cool things” are mostly protected by Copyright. While there are some movies and music that are not protected because they were made early enough that the registration has expired (think 1920s silent films) or whose owners failed to renew the copyright registration many years ago, it is really difficult to know which “cool things” are now in the “public domain” and which are still under registration. Making a mistake about that kind of thing can ruin your day.
Copyright owners and rights organizations now use pretty sophisticated computer programs to sniff around for unauthorized copying on the Internet, and they can track down users of P2P software programs right to the actual computer running the software, the time, date and Internet address used. Also, internet service providers are cooperating with rights owners in sending legal notices to P2P users.
One thing that you may not know is that when you use P2P software, you are not only downloading a copy of the files you see, but also your computer is being used to store and upload lots of other files that you may not see or even know are there. There have been cases where P2P users have been accused of distribution of child pornography because certain files were flowing from the Internet to their P2P software, being stored on their hard drives, and then re-transmitted to other P2P users – all without the knowledge of the person who used the P2P software in the first place.
So…think very hard. iTunes? NetFlix? HuluPlus? Or…you could make the Doc’s day by continuing your outlaw ways, and getting one of those letters. If you do, however, the attorneys at LW&H deal with this kind of thing. Give them a call.
– Lawrence A. Husick, Esq.
‘Best mode’ is the requirement that a patent applicant disclose the best way that the applicant knows to practice an invention. The purpose of the ‘best mode’ requirement is to fulfill the public disclosure goals of the patent system by preventing a patent applicant from obtaining a patent while at the same time keeping the best parts of the invention secret.
One of the exclusive rights in copyright granted to the creator of a work is the right to distribute it. For instance, if you self-publish a book — a popular activity these days — you also have the exclusive right to make copies and distribute them to whomever you want. The distribution right, however, is not unlimited. If I were to purchase one of your self-published books, the law permits me to resell it to whomever I want without violating your exclusive right of distribution. This is known as the “First Sale” doctrine — codified in Section 109 (a) of the Copyright Act. The First Sale doctrine is important because it legitimizes the sales activities of used book stores, art galleries, and other establishments, which resell copyrighted works. But what are the limits of the First Sale doctrine? That was the question raised by a recent case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 
Trademark owners are now litigating more than ever to preserve their brand names and logos. They are taking aggressive stands with much success. Here are some recent examples.
Most of us use our cell phones for business and personal use. For instance, in the car returning from a family Thanksgiving celebration, my wife read her business e-mail, checked the weather, referred to a map for our location, and browsed for Black Friday sales. We all assume such phone activities are relatively private, but are they?